Talk:DUKW

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the DUKW article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 3 months

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on DUKW. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:28, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Duck Boats inherently unsafe

42 people have died in commercially operated civilian duck boats,. The boats are being used in marine environments totally unsuited to them

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5976747/Lawyer-calls-duck-boats-BANNED-17-passengers-drown-Missouri.html

2A02:C7F:DA68:2600:293B:8222:D289:4FDA (talk) 08:53, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's the Daily Mail, also known as "Daily Fail". You'll need a more reliable source, and you'll also need to ignore the many rescues performed with the DUKW. I'd say the various deaths on DUKW tourist outings are due to poor judgement on the part of the operator, or poor maintenance of the vehicle. Binksternet (talk) 09:52, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gosh. Who could have guessed that a military vehicle created to transport troops in 1942 may not anticipate safety standards expected for public transport in 2018. Go figure. (For comparison, the equivalent car might be a Pontiac Streamliner or aircraft might be a DC4. I imagine few of either are used to transport paying passengers nowadays.)

But the NTSB warned about the dangers - poor maintenance, inadequate reserve buoyancy, and closed canopies preventing escape - nearly 20 years ago.[1] As the article on duck tour notes, an incident in London in 2013 was caused by the foam added to a DUKW to improve its reserve buoyancy catching fire. 213.205.240.154 (talk) 10:28, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Duck boat

When did these things acquire the name "duck boat"? For a start, it is a wheeled vehicle that can swim, not a boat. The earliest reference I can find is to the Philadelphia tour company, Duck Boat Tours Inc, which began operating in 2004. 213.205.240.154 (talk) 10:28, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"For a start, it is a wheeled vehicle that can swim, not a boat." Yes, just like ducks, which are birds that spend the majority of their time on land, but go into the water to forage for food or escape predators. Yet, ducks are associated more with water than land. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8000:7800:9F15:7828:29A2:7415:4B43 (talk) 12:43, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The K in DUKW

We have a Highlander situation. This DUKW article says that K designates front-wheel drive. The CCKW article says that K designates all-wheel drive. There can be only one. 92.10.212.241 (talk) 15:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The cited source says "The third letter, 'K', is the letter given to GMC vehicles which have front wheel drive". This was effectively all-wheel drive because front drive was added to rear-wheel drive. Binksternet (talk) 16:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]