Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Environment

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Environment and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

WikiProject Environment was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on April 2010.

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by .

Good article nomination for Chevrolet Volt (first generation)

Chevrolet Volt (first generation) has been nominated for a good article nomination. If you are interested in the discussion, feel free to review or comment on the article. Best, 750h+ (talk) 10:05, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Invasive species

Invasive species has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:25, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Hypoxia (environmental)#Requested move 10 February 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Hypoxia (environmental)#Requested move 10 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 02:17, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Rewilding (conservation biology)#Requested move 4 March 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Rewilding (conservation biology)#Requested move 4 March 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RFC on Food and Health at Climate change

There is an RFC requesting that editors choose between one of two draft sections on Food and Health in the article on Climate change. Please take part in the RFC. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI. The RfC can be found here:

Talk:Climate_change#RFC:_Food_and_health_section

--David Tornheim (talk) 19:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion around forestry and climate change mitigation

@EMsmile has started a discussion at WikiProject Climate Change called "How to clean up the mess around trees and mitigation?". As part of that discussion, it has been proposed to merge a few of the forestry articles. If you could contribute to the discussion on that talk page to help find clarity on the way forward and also mention you are from this project that would be great Chidgk1 (talk) 18:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Sustainable forest management, Afforestation, and Proforestation

Articles that you have been involved in editing—Sustainable forest management, Afforestation, and Proforestation—have been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Chidgk1 (talk) 07:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Laboratoire des sciences du climat et de l'environnement#Requested move 27 May 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Laboratoire des sciences du climat et de l'environnement#Requested move 27 May 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 01:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Climate change sceptics

Why don't we have a category for this? There are many sceptics out there particularly on the right side of politics. We have a category for COVID-19 conspiracy theorists and this would be similar. LibStar (talk) 20:45, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zero carbon housing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Someone conflated Net zero home with Zero carbon housing, by rewriting the article in June 2024 and adding Net Zero. Now the article is a mess. Its intro paragraph contradicts the succeeding paragraph, and will confuse readers into thinking they are the same, when net zero is not about zero emissions at all, but offsets. That would fit more into line with the other article Low-energy house -- 64.229.90.32 (talk) 22:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Ford Evos (concept car)#Requested move 17 June 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Ford Evos (concept car)#Requested move 17 June 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Nature

Nature has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for evaluation of Groen (political party)

Hello! I hope it's okay to ask this here (I'm fairly new). I spent some time updating and improving this article Groen (political party) (Belgian Flemish green party). Checking the history, I noticed that several sections were written-removed-written-removed etc etc for having no neutral pov or no sources or... So I wanted to ask some input or evaluation of the page as it is now. I'm absolutely not claiming it is a very good article now, honestly it's just medium-good. But when I started it was such a mess and I put in some work so I hope people aren't going to delete it again. There are two tags: verification and update-needed, and I THINK both can be removed. (Except we just had elections, so actually it's going to be outdated very soon again. That was not so smart of me, but okay.) I hope that this can be the basis of a better article. Do you have any remarks or comments? Inktaap (talk) 17:56, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for "No net loss wetlands policy" to be renamed

Hi all! I have been looking at the no net loss wetlands policy page and would like to propose its renaming to "No net loss policy in the United States" and subsequent creation of an article that discusses no net loss worldwide. Since no net loss policy approaches have expanded beyond just the US where this idea originated and this issue has already been tagged, I think this would be a helpful improvement to address the lack of worldwide view taken by the article while still retaining the content since I think it is too big just for a section. I am planning on working on this in a sandbox if anyone is interested in collaborating or has any other suggestions? Manxshearwater (talk) 12:02, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Tonlé Sap#Requested move 10 July 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Tonlé Sap#Requested move 10 July 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Reading Beans 17:45, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tesla Model S at FAC

Hello contributors of the project, the article Tesla Model S, one of the most important electric vehicles of the 21st century, has been put up for FAC, if you would like to leave your comments, they'd be highly appreciated. Much thanks, 750 h+ 13:14, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for Restoration of the Everglades

I have nominated Restoration of the Everglades for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 00:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PROD of Hairshirt environmentalism

There is a proposed deletion of Hairshirt environmentalism. The notability has been questioned; for certain the page needs serious attention. If nobody works on it and/or opposes the PROD then it will be deleted on Sept 20, 2024. If it is of interest to this project then please edit; I am neutral on the topic beyond thinking that a PROD might be hasty. Ldm1954 (talk) 22:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Bees and toxic chemicals

Bees and toxic chemicals has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:07, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty

Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:35, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Food waste in the United Kingdom

Food waste in the United Kingdom has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:02, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Traditional ecological knowledge and traditional knowledge discussion at WP:FTN

There is a thread at the Fringe Theories Noticeboard about the articles traditional ecological knowledge and traditional knowledge that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Please consider joining the discussion. Hydrangeans (she/her | talk | edits) 00:48, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Center on Race, Poverty and the Environment

Perhaps someone from this WikiProject could take a look at The Center on Race, Poverty and the Environment and assess it (particularly with respect to WP:NORG and WP:NOBLE). The article was created directly in the main space by a student participating in a WP:WEP affiliated university course; so, it never really underwent any type of formal assessment (e.g. WP:AFC) and it doesn't seem to have yet been reviewed by WP:NPP. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:04, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]